ablation_study.py 6.4 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136
  1. import json
  2. import os
  3. import sys
  4. from datetime import datetime
  5. from typing import List, Dict, Any
  6. # Ensure project root is in python path
  7. sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
  8. from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
  9. from app.db.session import SessionLocal
  10. from app.models import Forum, Message
  11. from app.crud import get_forum
  12. from app.agent.agent import run_simple_agent
  13. # Define the 5 Evaluation Dimensions (Optimized for Multi-Agent Advantages)
  14. EVALUATION_METRICS = {
  15. "1. 观点多样性与碰撞 (Perspective Diversity & Collision)": {
  16. "definition": "是否涵盖议题的多个对立面或不同维度,存在鲜明的观点碰撞和张力。",
  17. "score_1": "观点单一,老生常谈,缺乏新意或对立视角。",
  18. "score_5": "涵盖多学科/多立场视角,存在深度的观点交锋和辩论。",
  19. "optimization": "引入背景、立场各异的角色,鼓励辩论。"
  20. },
  21. "2. 深度演进 (Depth Evolution)": {
  22. "definition": "随着对话进行,观点是否变得更加深刻,是否解决了初步的质疑,实现螺旋上升。",
  23. "score_1": "观点在原地打转,只是换个说法重复。",
  24. "score_5": "像剥洋葱一样层层递进,从表面现象深入到本质机制或哲学层面。",
  25. "optimization": "引入定期总结和深度思考机制,防止循环论证。"
  26. },
  27. "3. 交互批判性 (Interactive Criticality)": {
  28. "definition": "对他人观点的回应是否具有批判性,能否精准指出逻辑漏洞并迫使对方回应。",
  29. "score_1": "自说自话,或只是简单的附和/反对,无逻辑支撑。",
  30. "score_5": "精准打击对方逻辑弱点,迫使对方修正或完善观点,形成有效对话。",
  31. "optimization": "共享记忆机制,确保智能体能准确引用和反驳。"
  32. },
  33. "4. 观点实质性与落地性 (Argument Substantiality & Grounding)": {
  34. "definition": "发言是否具备实质内容,引用具体案例、数据或历史事实,拒绝“假大空”。",
  35. "score_1": "充斥正确的废话、盲目附和,缺乏细节支撑。",
  36. "score_5": "论据详实,引用具体数据、文献或案例支撑论点,逻辑严密。",
  37. "optimization": "接入外部知识库(RAG)或专家角色设定。"
  38. },
  39. "5. 角色鲜明度 (Character Distinctiveness)": {
  40. "definition": "角色是否具有独特的人格魅力和语言风格,而非千篇一律的AI味。",
  41. "score_1": "所有角色说话都像同一个AI助手,千人一面。",
  42. "score_5": "即使遮住名字,也能通过语言风格和思维方式分辨出是谁。",
  43. "optimization": "ReAct动态生成的高自由度角色,强化人设指令。"
  44. }
  45. }
  46. def get_forum_history(db: Session, forum_id: int) -> str:
  47. """Fetch and format forum history for evaluation."""
  48. forum = get_forum(db, forum_id)
  49. if not forum:
  50. print(f"Forum {forum_id} not found.")
  51. return ""
  52. messages = db.query(Message).filter(Message.forum_id == forum_id).order_by(Message.timestamp.asc()).all()
  53. history_str = f"Forum Topic: {forum.topic}\n\n"
  54. for msg in messages:
  55. history_str += f"[{msg.speaker_name}]: {msg.content}\n"
  56. return history_str
  57. def compare_forums(forum_id_a: int, forum_id_b: int, ablation_desc: str):
  58. """Run ablation study evaluation (A vs B)."""
  59. db = SessionLocal()
  60. try:
  61. history_a = get_forum_history(db, forum_id_a)
  62. history_b = get_forum_history(db, forum_id_b)
  63. if not history_a or not history_b:
  64. print("One or both forums not found.")
  65. return
  66. print(f"Comparing Forum {forum_id_a} vs Forum {forum_id_b} (Ablation: {ablation_desc})...")
  67. prompt = f"""
  68. 你是一位公正、专业的辩论与讨论评估专家。请对以下两场圆桌论坛进行【对比分析】(Side-by-Side Evaluation)。
  69. 这两场论坛基于相同的主题,但设置上存在消融差异(Ablation Difference):{ablation_desc}。
  70. 【论坛 A 对话记录】
  71. {history_a[:8000]} # Truncate if too long
  72. 【论坛 B 对话记录】
  73. {history_b[:8000]} # Truncate if too long
  74. 【评估任务】
  75. 请基于以下 5 个维度,分别对 A 和 B 进行打分(1-5分),并详细说明为何其中一方优于另一方。
  76. """
  77. for dim, criteria in EVALUATION_METRICS.items():
  78. prompt += f"\n### {dim}\n"
  79. prompt += f"- 核心定义: {criteria['definition']}\n"
  80. prompt += f"- 1分标准: {criteria['score_1']}\n"
  81. prompt += f"- 5分标准: {criteria['score_5']}\n"
  82. prompt += f"- 参考优化方向: {criteria['optimization']}\n"
  83. prompt += """
  84. \n【输出格式要求】
  85. 请直接输出一个 Markdown 格式的对比报告,包含以下章节:
  86. 1. **总体评分对比表** (包含各维度 A/B 得分)
  87. 2. **维度逐项分析** (针对每个维度,分析 A 和 B 的表现差异,指出消融设置带来的具体影响)
  88. 3. **消融结论** (总结该变量对讨论质量的关键影响,例如:“去掉理论库导致观点深度显著下降...”)
  89. """
  90. result_text = run_simple_agent(
  91. "AblationEvaluationAgent",
  92. "你是一位公正、专业的多智能体讨论评估专家。",
  93. prompt,
  94. )
  95. if result_text:
  96. # Save result
  97. os.makedirs("exam/results", exist_ok=True)
  98. output_file = f"exam/results/ablation_{forum_id_a}_vs_{forum_id_b}_{datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d_%H%M%S')}.md"
  99. with open(output_file, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
  100. f.write(f"# 消融实验报告: Forum {forum_id_a} vs {forum_id_b}\n")
  101. f.write(f"**消融变量描述**: {ablation_desc}\n\n")
  102. f.write(result_text)
  103. print(f"Ablation study complete. Report saved to {output_file}")
  104. print(result_text)
  105. else:
  106. print("HelloAgents evaluation failed.")
  107. finally:
  108. db.close()
  109. if __name__ == "__main__":
  110. if len(sys.argv) < 4:
  111. print("Usage: python exam/ablation_study.py <forum_id_A> <forum_id_B> <ablation_description>")
  112. else:
  113. compare_forums(int(sys.argv[1]), int(sys.argv[2]), sys.argv[3])